2.6.1 PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness.
Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis (God rest his soul, passed away in Aug 2019 just before the ongoing psychological operation started) who had been shouting from the rooftops for decades to not use his RT-PCR amplification technique to detect any illness, was ignored and the RT-PCR test based on computer-generated short genetic sequences was ushered in to ramp up the case numbers and keep populations in extreme fear.
The RT-PCR tests were used (and are still being used in India) to detect one’s own genetic material and claim that people have this so-called novel disease when they are not even expressing any symptoms. Case in point: In India, 97.2% of the 46.3 crore ‘cases’ till Aug 2021 were asymptomatic (that is, they were healthy people)
Source: The Truth of the Scamdemic by Awaken India Movement and GoSatvik
The RT-PCR Test takes a sample of genetic material from the para nasal passage or throat and runs it through an enzyme called Reverse Transcriptase to convert the RNA from the virus into DNA and then multiplies the DNA exponentially to find if fragments of the Sars-Cov-2 virus are present in the person. Since complete viruses and not their fragments are necessary for transmission, the PCR test is an invalid test when it comes to proving whether a person has an active Sars-Cov-2 infection or not.
When the genetic material is being amplified, it is being done via cycles, which makes the quantity double after every cycle.
For e.g. If 35 cycles of the RT-PCR are run, the first cycle will multiply the material from 1 to 2, the next one will take it from 2 to 4, & so on, until 35 cycles are completed. To put this into perspective, if the RT-PCR test starts with a quantity of 2 virus fragments, at the end of 35 cycles it will create 3436 crore/ 34360 million virus fragments.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): Steps in This DNA Test by MedicineNet.com
Issues with the RT-PCR Coronavirus Test
The inventor of the RT-PCR Test, Kary Mullis, an American Biochemist, who got the Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR technique, said that if you run the PCR Test long enough, you can find almost anything in anybody. It doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to make you sick. He also stated that it is not meant to be a diagnostic tool and was skeptical that any PCR test is ever true. He mysteriously died just before the so-called Pandemic, which raised eyebrows across the world suspecting murder.
30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet by Kit Knightly
The Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the “gold standard” for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:
“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
Source: No Jab For Me by Paul Adams
The PCR tests do not detect SARS-CoV-2 particles, but particles from any number of viruses you might have contracted in the past, and that a lawsuit for crimes against humanity is being launched by a German attorney, Reiner Fuellmich, for this fraud.
A primer on PCR tests. A retraction letter by an international consortium of life-science scientists, admits PCR tests are flawed.
The Truth of The Scamdemic by Awaken India Movement and GoSatvik
FDA document admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else. PCR Test has not been FDA cleared or approved. Go on the last page which says: This product has not been FDA cleared or approved.
The inventor of the the test, (Karry Mullis) said it does not detect virus as a cause of disease. To watch on YouTube, click here. The PCR Test is only for research not for diagnosis – Manufacturer. Austrian Court Rules PCR Test Not Suitable For COVID-19 Diagnosis & The Lockdown Has No Legal Basis
Bulgarian Pathology Association mentions it to be scientifically meaningless. A lady tested positive 31 times in a period of 5 months. She is still healthy.
A document published by FDA (U.S Food and Drug Administration) regarding the efficacy of RT-PCR test released in the beginning of the so-called pandemic released on 04th February, 2020. The document clearly states that the RT-PCR test is only capable of checking the presence of genetic material of coronaviruses in one’s body.
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel,
Above evidence clears that RT-PCR test cannot detect any infectious virus (2019-nCov) in a person (detecting viral RNA is not same as detecting the Virus). The document further points out that –
“This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens” In other words, FDA document clears that RTPCR Test cannot diagnose the cause of sickness or death.CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
Mainstream propaganda about accuracy of PCR Tests
CDC finally admits PCR tests are a sham!
629 total views, 5 views today