2.6.5 The scientific basis for PCR test is questionable.

30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet by Kit Knightly

The genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019, then published on January 10th 2020. Less than two weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests. 

They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020, and then accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper was allegedly “peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.

Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper’s methodology

They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply. 

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless by OffGuardian

13 Proof that Corona Test is FAKE! – Go Satvik

Medical Doctors from USA, Canada and India expose the Corona Test. Kamalpreet Singh & Dr. Carrie Madej. Kamalpreet Singh with Dr. Patrick Phillips. Kamalpreet Singh with Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury. To listen to deleted interviews of Indian & International doctors, click here

Former Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon – PCR Testing – video Dailymotion

The COVID-19 “Casedemic”

Source: Snooze 2 Awaken by Sol Luckman

The Cult(ure) of Scientific Misdirection*
Dr. Andrew Kaufman on PCR Testing False Positives
The “Test Everybody” Has NO Scientific Validity Whatsoever


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

One thought on “2.6.5 The scientific basis for PCR test is questionable.

Leave a Reply